Goliath comes in many forms~
It is time to stop the devastation to innocent families which is occurring daily across the country.
My Family Rights Affiliation


Tuesday, September 29, 2015


Note 1: Public Records laws vary from country to country. So, we will soon see, what is public and what is not.

Note 2: Our focus is on psychiatrists.  Not psychologists, not mental health counselors nor social workers
and not marriage & family therapists.
So we do welcome our Canadian Neighbors
on this Extensive Project

PsychSearch.net identified every psychiatrist in the USA and then launched a research project that continues to this day. The project involves continuous contact with each state to obtain records of "psychiatrists in hot water".  

This has now developed into the largest collection of public records on USA psychiatrists in existence.  

Over the years, we've often heard from folks outside the USA: "Are you going to do this in our country?" 

"No plans at this time" was always our answer.

Until now.  A generous Canadian has now suggested that PsychSearch expand its horizons to the Great White North!
Brrr....   So, we've decided to start providing records on Canadian psychiatrists!   Oh Canada!  We're going to light up those psych records with some sunshine! - Oh yahh, you betcha!

Hover your mouse over "USA Psychiatrists" here:  http://www.psychsearch.net/
That is where you will soon see the Canadian records appearing.

There are 14 Canadian provinces and territories and the Canuck's have one-tenth the number of psychiatrists
as opposed to the USA.  So, the speed at which we investigate and buy the Canadian records (and then put online) depends only upon the continuing financial support the Rulers of Hockey can provide.

We should make good fast progress on this project, eh? 

And to you generous souls in other English speaking countries - Australia, England, New Zealand, Northern
Ireland, Scotland and Wales:

Who's next after Canada?

Finance the inexorable push to document Psychs in Hot Water - Click recurring here:

A byproduct of the PsychSearch.net compilation of records research project is the daily "Psych in Hot Water" news!

Join your friends at the Facebook Group - Psychs!

Now over 9,000 members!

Best Regards,
Kenneth Kramer
Researcher - PsychSearch.net
Licensed Private Investigator
DataSearch, Inc.
FL PI License # C-1400565
"There's One Way to Find Out!"
Call 888-Find-Out

May you find Strength in Your Higher Power,
GranPa Chuck
Researcher, Editor, Publisher
Click HERE to learn "How To Win In Court" ... without a lawyer

Wednesday, August 19, 2015

We Are All Parents. Yes?

One of the latest emails from the Parental Rights Organization bring up so very good points on being a parent is everyone and anyone raising our children. So check out some of the thoughts below from this email.

And perhaps reflect on the logo of the National Family Advocacy Team for
Our Families, Our Children, Our Future

Our Logo
Or, better yet, ask yourself "Why hasn't the Parental Rights Amendment Passed Already?"

Keeping in mind that one of the 4P's of Family Advocacy is "PERSONAL" since everyone of us, including Politicians, have had a Family sometime in their life, yes?
May you find strength in our Higher Power,
Granpa Chuck
National Team Coordinator
National Family Advocacy Team.
So check out this recent email from the Parental Rights Organization>>>>


-- August 18, 2015
ParentalRights.org logoLike any other organization, ParentalRights.org got its start within one particular demographic. Founder Michael Farris and his leadership team already had certain allies, certain contacts, and a certain audience they could reach easily. So that’s the corner in which we started.

After a few years, I had a conversation with a colleague from ParentalRights.org’s “parent” organization who assumed our list of contacts was still pretty much a subset of their own. He was surprised to learn that by then (and this was years ago), a full 30% of our list had no connection to that original demographic.

And why should they? Parental rights are important to all, not just one small group.
A poll conducted by Zogby in 2010 revealed that Americans across the political spectrum agree with traditional parental rights. When presented with the statement that,
“In general, parents have the constitutional right to make decisions for their children without government interference unless there is proof of abuse or neglect,”:
  • 90.8% of Independents,
  • 92.4% of Democrats, and
  • 97.5% of Republicans
all agreed.
These days Republicans and Democrats agree on very few issues. But loving parents raising their children is an issue that every parent agrees with. This kind of like-minded support must be taken seriously.
Our Backgrounds
Parental rights supporters include parents like Maryanne Godboldo, a single black mother from Detroit who stood up to the police and child welfare services when they came to take her daughter from her home. And they include parents like Lou and Linda Pelletier, a middle class white family from Connecticut whose daughter was kidnapped by the Department of Child and Family Services in Massachusetts at the request of Boston Children’s Hospital because a doctor there disagreed with the teen’s existing diagnosis from another provider.
These families may come from entirely different backgrounds and social cultures. But they both love their children and want the legal power to do what is best to meet their daughters’ needs!
Standing Against the Law
Additional supporters include parents of all stripes who stood together in California this spring to oppose SB 277, a bill that has stripped away their authority to decide whether or not a vaccine is right for their child.
They also include parents opposed to Common Core, who recognize that removing public education decisions from the state and local level is just another way to keep parents out of any meaningful decision-making roles in the process.
The fact is, our supporters don’t fit into just one mold anymore. We are Democrats, Republicans, Independents. Some are wealthy, while some live well below the poverty line. We are Christians, Muslims, Jews, Hindus, Atheists, Pagans, and any number of other faiths – even those of no faith.
We are descended from Africans, Asians, Europeans, Polynesians, and indigenous Americans. We struggle with disabilities, or have children who do – or chronic or even rare diseases. We have gifted kids, struggling learners, and every kind of child in between.
And if I still haven’t named you yet, well, we include you, too!
But we are all parents. We are all in this together.
Promising Results
As an organization we have been working diligently behind the scenes to ensure that this next introduction of the Parental Rights Amendment will have bipartisan support. And we are seeing promising results.
Last week, we shared a video with you that is designed to carry the message of parental rights to minority parents in urban neighborhoods. Recently our forays into the inner city are uncovering a virtual army of citizens passionate about parental rights who simply didn’t know we existed. They have been quick to relate to our message, and eager to join the common cause. They don’t look like me, worship like me, vote like me, or choose to educate their children as I do mine.
But they love their children. And they see too many times that bureaucrats are reaching in and infringing their parental rights. I don’t have to look like them or live among them to know I heartily agree with them.
We are all parents. We are all in this together.
Stand Together
Among good parents there are a lot of different ideas about parenting. And there are countless ways one parent can differ from another. Yet we are all the same in this: we don’t need bureaucrats to tell us how to love our children.
Thank you for standing with us, and for making room for others under this ever-broadening tent of Parental Rights.
Michael Ramey
Director of Communications and Research

Thanks for reviewing this information.
Any comments would be Super.
If you don't know your Rights,
You have NONE
May you find Strength in Your Higher Power,
GranPa Chuck
Researcher, Editor, Publisher

Saturday, August 15, 2015

Call for Entries: Fostering the Future 2016

 Yes each year there is Foster Care Awareness Month.


Each year Children's Rights runs a Daily Post of those Caught in the Middle while waiting for the Adults to establish a Permanent and Secure home for the Foster Child.
 So how well is the AGENCY doing?? Check this out, "Shame on U.S"..

HOWEVER, after sharing stories with many Foster Children and Foster Care Givers, a question keeps coming up:
"Why are Many of these Children even in Foster Care?"

We ALL must keep in mind and remember to even create the Child Protective AGENCY, they were given two main tasks:
  • Protecting Children
  • Strengthening Families
with NO Particular Priority of either. (Refer to the History of CAPTA)

So we do encourage all those, who have been in Foster Care to, Yes share your experiences.

Maybe this will open the Eyes of the Public, who can not see the Big Picture that in the Scheme of Things it is about:
Our Families, Our Children, Our Future

But forget there are many Foster Children waiting for ADULTS to find solutions for the Child's safe, secure, and strong family.

Noting still too many don't realize that over 80% of the issues are about neglect, and most of these are those families that are having a hard time providing food, clothing and shelter. However, as part of Strengthening Families, the agency has been bond to assist by Making Reasonable Efforts to do so.

May you Find Strength in Your Higher Power,
GranPa Chuck
~~~~~~~~~~~~~So Please get your Entries in. Explained below~~~~~~

Posted: 14 Aug 2015 12:40 PM PDT

Do you, or someone you know, have a story to share about life in foster care? If so, Children’s Rights would love to hear it.

Children’s Rights is now accepting submissions for its 4th annual Fostering the Future campaign. The blog-a-day initiative, which takes place during National Foster Care Awareness Month, highlights the first-hand accounts of people who have experienced state care. Those interested in participating should email communications@childrensrights.org.

Past bloggers have used their stories to expose people across the country to the realities of foster care, and to inspire others still in state care.

“Giving young people the opportunity to reveal their experiences to the world is a profound and revolutionary thing,” said 2015 blogger Kristopher Sharp. “Fostering the Future provides youth who have been involved with the foster care system an important platform to educate the public while simultaneously giving them a forum to share their own truths.”

Julius Kissinger, a blogger from Ohio, called the opportunity “incredible.” “I chose to do this not only to share my story, but to inform people who are, or have gone through, similar struggles that there is hope, there is always hope,” he said.

Catherine Konold, a participant from Utah, said even though she was a little nervous to tell her foster care story, “I knew that it could help kids in similar situations.”

The project calls for people to submit a blog post of up to 750 words along with a high-resolution photo. The blog should, in some way, shape or form, address the following:
“How did going through foster care affect your life? Based on your experience, do you think foster care should change?”

If they wish, writers may want to consider addressing:
    • What they would say to other kids going through foster care
    • Who influenced them while they were in foster care
    • What are their best and/or worst memories of foster care
    • Any other issues related to foster care that they personally find important
Children’s Rights encourages a creative approach. As each person, and his or her experience, is unique, there is no template for the blogs. And while CR works to reform foster care, the organization strives to include all perspectives in Fostering the Future, including those who found their experiences to be positive and beneficial. The blogs, which will be promoted via CR’s Facebook and Twitter pages, will be housed on the organization’s website.

Blogs will be edited for length and clarity and submitting a blog does not guarantee it will be used.
If you have any questions, please email communications@childrensrights.org. You can check out blog posts from previous participants at http://fosteringthefuture.com. 

The post Call for Entries: Fostering the Future 2016 appeared first on Children's Rights.


The Team Members, of the National Family Advocacy Team, feel it is time that we "Rethink Foster Care" as it is today>> Learn More

Nuff Said, yes?

    National Coordinator of the Family Survey Program
  • When One Deals with the Child Protective AGENCY>>;LearnMore

Saturday, August 1, 2015

"Aren't we worth more than the sum of our parts?"

YES, the issue of abortion and life will always be a HIGHLY Controversial Subject.

Myself, I am Pro-Choice. Will say that with this in mind and those Closest to Me have been
given the OPTION of Abortion.... AND, to this day each and everyone chose to bring their Baby to this Wild & Crazy world.

The following article does have that CONTROVERSIAL video.>>

Heartbeat President: "Aren't we worth more than the sum of our parts?"

 However, consider these points from the Article:
  • "While Planned Parenthood, the nation’s largest abortion provider with over 327,166 abortions reported in its 2012-13 annual report,......."
    Whether the body part thingy for profit or not, to me, that is of no consequence. How about YOU??
  • “Women deserve better than abortion,” Hartshorn said. “That is why pregnancy help centers, medical clinics, maternity homes and non-profit adoption agencies offer a mother all the information she needs to make the healthiest choice for everyone involved in an unexpected pregnancy.”
    ...............................>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Read Article
FINALLY, Our Staff of the National Family Advocacy Team are currently researching the VALIDITY of this CHECK LIST created in 1969 relating to "Population Control". One may want to take a moment to compare where we are TODAY?  >>> See the Table of 1969..ie The Controversial Jaffe Memo
The Truth is Always the TRUTH.  
So carefully do your homework to hopefully find the Truth were yes Controversy will be an issue.
HOWEVER, If one believes in 
Our Family, Our Children, Our Future ~ PRICELESS.
What is your Opinion??

Nuff Said, yes? For we are ALL responsible for our actions.
Whether it is an Alleged Leader; or Common Jane or Joe.
"e pluribus unum"..ie From the Many, ONE.

  • National Coordinator of the Family Survey Program
    When One Deals with the Child Protective AGENCY

Wednesday, June 24, 2015

On the Brink of a Game Changer for Parental Rights

-- June 24, 2015
On the Brink of a Game Changer for Parental Rights

The delay of our Summer Power Sweep has yielded its first dividend, and though I still must remain vague on the details I can report that we have secured our first commitment from a Democrat to cosponsor the Parental Rights Amendment (PRA) in the U.S. House! This is one small piece in a larger puzzle, but it is a positive step toward a real game changer in our parental rights effort.

Those who have been with us for a while will recall that although parental rights efforts at the state level have consistently been bipartisan, Congress has been a different story. At one point we had 141 cosponsors in the House, of which 140 were Republicans. In Washington’s “party-first” atmosphere that was 140 reasons for Democrats to say, “No, thank you,” without even considering the language we proposed.

For those who have been wondering, this has been the reason for delaying our Summer Power Sweep – to make sure the PRA starts out on bipartisan footing this time around. And we are now a major step closer to that goal.

But that’s not all. We are seeing other in-roads as well.

Last week, David Miranda and I attended the annual meeting of the Southern Baptist Convention in Columbus, Ohio, where we had opportunity to talk with hundreds of pastors and leaders of other organizations. As a result of our week, ParentalRights.org will soon be sitting down with the public policy arm of the nation’s largest protestant denomination, as well. And the potential of even one of these pastors to influence an entire community for our cause cannot be measured or guessed.
In short, any one of the hundreds we talked to could turn out to be yet another game changer in our favor.

David and I then finished our week at the Mitochondrial Disease Conference in Herndon, Virginia, where we met dozens of families affected by this misunderstood disease. A majority of these parents will be accused of medical abuse or neglect at some point in their child’s medical journey. They understand just how vital their parental rights are.

Organizationally, they also have the ear of the bipartisan Mitochondrial Disease Caucus in Congress. That group is currently made up of 7 Republicans and almost twice as many Democrats. Securing the support of some of these on the Parental Rights Amendment, which the Mito community may help us to do, would be another game changer for the PRA.
Action Items
With the Summer Power Sweep still on hold, what can you do to further the cause of parental rights?

As I write this, 69,052 Facebook users are fans of our ParentalRights.org page. We would like to hit just 70,000 as a direct result of this email. So please take a moment if you haven’t already to “like” our page. And if you already have, please share it to a few select friends and ask them to “like” us as well. It may seem like a small thing, but Facebook is a growing platform for us, and one we can use to reach many more Americans with the need to protect their parental rights.

And if you haven’t already, why not download the petition here and see if you can find a few friends to help you fill up a page? Don’t forget to make plans for National Parental Rights Week starting July 20, too, with a goal of at least filling one page (16 signatures) to increase our reach for this vital cause.

This is our best chance to pass the Parental Rights Amendment. Let us work to make the most of it!
Michael Ramey
Director of Communications & Research

Think about it
Nuff Said, yes?



  • National Coordinator of the Family Survey Program
    When One Deals with the Child Protective AGENCY

Sunday, June 21, 2015

Happy Father's Day

Happy Father's Day from NFAT
And, yes no matter where he might be.
For a Common Suggested VISION is &
Since we are All Connected in one way or another

Our Families,
Our Children,
Our Future


May you find Strength in
Your Higher Power,
Keeper of the web files for http://nfpcar.org

Monday, June 15, 2015

50% of Our Children are Reunified with their Family. Why just 50%????

The other day my staff of NFAT were reviewing the Reports created from the data provided by the NUMEROUS agencies connected with Family, Children, and Welfare issues. (Check Out other reports>> http://nfpcar.org/Kids_Count/#Overview )

Please Note: This is sort of a TEST,
depending on your answers.
But remember in Life there is usually no One particular Quiz paper; the Correct Answers will vary depending on your Life Experiences. The only "Hint" provided, is how can we make a Positive out of the concerns in this Crazy World?

For your viewing, here is the National Chart created from the data gathered for "Exit Reasons for those in Foster Care".
I suppose to be "Statistically" correct, we should have said 51-52% between 2009 to 2013. Noting, of course, all the the "Rest" of the exit reason are very close also.

BUT, one has to ask, are these close percentages just a Reflection of the Budget to Maintain the Child Protective INDUSTRY???

Let's see says Joe AGENCY manager: "We will match our goal of about 50%; and then ADJUST the remainder to fullfill our AGENCY NEEDS". My job is done here, have a nice day, says Joe.

Keep in mind the original PRIORITY as far as placement, SINCE DAY ONE was, but diluted over the years by amendments to CAPTA;
  • Reunify with parents. Noting "Reasonable Efforts" is the primary tool to use.
  • Seek Relative Placement to care for the children (Guardianship or Adoption may be considered) Noting, by Federal Standard concerns, all a Relative had to be was "Fit" and "Willing"
  • Finally, seek care of a Non-Relative (And yes Adoption may be considered.
So then one has to ask about the Financial Support. YES, it is about the $$$$. Noting, we as Family, need $$$$ to live don't we???

So as an example, here is the 2015 Federal Budget for Title IVe Funding:

That's where my staff asked me: "How does the Funding support the Priority of Placement as specified in CAPTA???
Think about it
Nuff Said, yes?



  • National Coordinator of the Family Survey Program
    When One Deals with the Child Protective AGENCY

Wednesday, June 10, 2015

AMA Lobby Opposes Parental Rights

A prime example of Big Business influencing the AMA, which in turn affects
Our Family, Our Children, Our Future.

When are “We the People” going to realize that our current political climate is one of OLIGARGHY? Is it too late to fight the power of Big Business and related Governmental Agencies???

Will say the Parental Rights Organization (Ref: Understand the Issue) has been actively been try to preserve Parental Rights, and everyone and anyone should be a active supporter and even a Family Advocate to support this cause.
As I learned many years ago:
The hand the Rocks the Cradle, RULES the WORLD
Keep Care
And Never Give Up,
GranPa Chuck
AMA Lobby Opposes Parental Rights
Wed, Jun 9, 2015

The American Medical Association (AMA) on Monday voted to oppose religious or philosophical exemptions for childhood vaccinations, in what its members hope will be a determinative blow against informed consent and a parent’s right to protect the bodily integrity of their child.

Two states already deny parents and children these rights under law. Neither Mississippi nor West Virginia allow for a religious or philosophical exemption by law. These states coincidentally both rank at the very bottom in both education (43rd and 50th) and economic (50th and 45th) outcomes, but suddenly the AMA finds them “cutting-edge.”

A bill in California (SB277) is being steam-rolled through the legislature in a rush to outlaw parental conscience in that state as well, which in part has fueled the AMA’s decision.

"We have a bill presently in California at the state legislature to remove all non-medical exemptions. We're worried that weak AMA policy will [affect] the California state legislature," admitted California AMA delegate Mark H. Kogan, MD, according to MedPageToday.

Ironically, the discussion arose from a report by the AMA’s Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs and its Council on Science and Public Health that called for better education, not stronger mandates, to improve vaccine rates. According to an article at Modern Healthcare, the report called for state laws to provide “clear definitions of accepted grounds for non-medical exemptions that prudently limit such exemptions,” and “...fair, reasonable procedures for granting non-medical exemptions.”

But delegates voted to reject the study of their own councils to take “a strong position” on mandatory vaccines.

The American Medical Association is a trade and lobbying association of medical professionals in the United States. It is made of primarily of medical doctors, and its primary functions are to advise and to lobby on medical best-practices.
In decisions such as this one, the lobbying function has clearly trumped the medical one.

Different speakers cited in several articles argued that forced vaccinations are for the good of the public. None, however, explain how mandating vaccines for non-communicable diseases like tetanus affects anyone but the child receiving the shot. Yet tetanus is among the vaccines currently required under California law which will become mandatory without exemption if SB277 is passed.

A representative from the Infectious Disease Society of America not otherwise identified by MedPage Today is quoted as summing it up nicely: “The science has to trump some of the ethical personal freedoms,” he said.

Another deeply disturbing quote comes from Forbes, which reports, “The AMA said there is no scientific basis for non-medical exemptions….” But could we provide a “scientific basis” for our freedom of speech? Of religion? Of the press, or of due process?

One’s legal rights do not depend on “science,” a fact of constitutional and natural law the AMA seems to have missed.

Fortunately, not all delegates agreed with this “ethics-be-damned” approach to vaccination law. Dr. Ryan Hall is among those who spoke in favor of the original report.

“I think CEJA got it right,” Hall said. “If we really want to change the debate, the solution to bad speech is good speech. We as an organization should not be trying to trample the rights of others. People sometimes have the right to be foolish.”

Whether or not it is foolish to opt out of vaccines for one’s child is a question best left to parents to answer. With its decision on Monday, the AMA has taken a strong stand against your fundamental right to make decisions you believe are in the best interests of your child.

Perhaps you are one of those who in recent years have begun to feel that doctors are your adversaries and not your friends. On Monday that feeling moved one step closer to reality.

Action Items
1. Talk to your doctor right away. Find out how this latest AMA decision may impact your family’s relationship with their practice. It is a sad fact: your best defense against a false medical abuse claim is a solid relationship with your child’s doctor.

2. Spread the word and encourage your friends to sign up with ParentalRights.org. The AMA is no small lobby. Their pockets are deep, and they are targeting your parental rights. If the effort to oppose SB 277 in California has taught us anything, it is that our voice must be overwhelming if we are to win.
Bulletin Insert for Father's Day
One way to spread the word could be to share our new bulletin insert with your house of worship this Father’s Day. The front-and-back, half-page insert features a short message from the Bible (for churches) or the Torah (for synagogues) and invites your congregation to visit ParentalRights.org. We have available a color or grayscale version for churches and a color version for synagogues.
Michael Ramey
Director of Communications & Research


  • National Coordinator of the Family Survey Program
    When One Deals with the Child Protective AGENCY