Information Below is from the
OFFICIAL WEBSITE
OFFICIAL WEBSITE
for
National Family Rights Protest
Link: http://www.govabuse.org/
National Family Rights Protest
Link: http://www.govabuse.org/
“Government Abuse IS Child Abuse for Profit”
(Note: Although NFPCAR is not Affiliated with this movement, we believe there are many concerns to consider for Our Families.
See Our Affiliation)
Also please check out Related thoughts after this information
See Our Affiliation)
Also please check out Related thoughts after this information
When: Friday, August 12, 2011
Where: See State/PLC tab for your area
Who: United States- Child/Family Rights Groups
Why:“We the People” are no longer tolerating;
- Unjust Laws
TAXPAYER dollars (billions) used to separate, and financially demolish families.
We the People” demand reformation of:
- OUR FAMILY COURT SYSTEMS including:
- Assigned Judges- (must be abolished)
- Court Appointed Guardian-ad-litem
(must be abolished or severely limited at a minimum) - Family courts / records must be made public
- Court Gag orders are a violation of 1st amendment
- Adoption incentive payments (must be abolished)
Re; Adoption / Safe Families Act 1997
Every effort must be made for children to stay with Grandparents / family members instead of foster care.
- Grandparents / family must have visitation rights without current criminal treatment
- Families must be given assistance instead of removing their Children. For example, removal due to gas shut-off
- Parents must be restored freedoms to raise their children
- Immediate access in all cases for children’s records
- Option to have a Jury, when requested in family courts
"We the People” demand reformation of:
OUR FAMILY COURT SYSTEM including:
Assigned Judges- must be abolished
- We are stripped of our right to elect public servants (judges)
- Assigned judges cannot be voted out of
office as they are ‘assigned’ to hear cases after pretending to retire. - They have zero incentive to administer justice or follow law or legal procedures because they cannot be voted out of office after they ‘retire’ THEREFORE, we have been stripped of our legal right to elect (vote) for our judges
- Assigned judges are ‘DOUBLE-DIPPING’. Pretend to ‘retire’ but are assigned to family court cases, collecting approx; $485.00 per ‘day’ while collecting their retirement pay- all paid by taxpayers
- Court appointed guardian-ad-litem / advocate for child / lawyer for child
-
Child Protective Services aka; CPS/ DHS / DFS/DSS/Foster Care and Adoption Services
________________________________
Related Information
A Statement for Your Consideration
May you find Strength in Your Higher Power, “We are joining forces with all persons affected by Parens Patriae to include parents, extended family, foster parents and father's and mother's rights groups. While this is a difficult endeavor due to various divisions, the focus will be on challenging the system with the unified goals and commonalities that each is suffering under in family courts and through CPS.”
(See Definition: Parens Patriae)
(See Definition: Parens Patriae)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Voice Your Concerns
- ________________________________
Granpa Chuck
Keeper of the web files for http://nfpcar.org
2 comments:
342 COURT ST. PEKIN ILLINOIS TAZEWELL COUNTY COURTHOUSE
COLOR OF LAW Civil Rights Violations
It is a crime for one or more persons acting under color of law willfully to deprive or conspire to deprive another person of any right protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.
"Color of law" simply means that the person doing the act is using power given to him or her by a governmental agency (local, state or federal).
Criminal acts under color of law include acts not only done by local, state, or federal officials within the bounds or limits of their lawful authority, but also acts done beyond the bounds of their lawful authority. Off-duty conduct may also be covered under color of law, if the perpetrator asserted their official status in some manner.
Color of law may include public officials who are not law enforcement officers, for example, judges and prosecutors, as well as, in some circumstances, non governmental employees who are asserting state authority, such as private security guards.
While the federal authority to investigate color of law type violations extends to any official acting under "color of law", the vast majority of the allegations are against the law enforcement community.
The average number of all federal civil rights cases initiated by the FBI from 1997 -2000 was 3513. Of those cases initiated, about 73% were allegations of color of law violations. Within the color of law allegations, about 82% were allegations of abuse of force with violence (59% of the total number of civil rights cases initiated).
The Supreme Court has had to interpret the United States Constitution to construct law regulating the actions of those in the law enforcement community. Enforcement of these provisions does not require that any racial, religious, or other discriminatory motive existed.
Investigative Areas
Most of the FBI's color of law investigations would fall into five broad areas:
excessive force;
sexual assaults;
false arrest/fabrication of evidence;
deprivation of property; and
failure to keep from harm.
In making arrests, maintaining order, and defending life, law enforcement officers are allowed to utilize whatever force is "reasonably" necessary. The breath and scope of the use of force is vast. The spectrum begins with the physical presence of the official through the utilization of deadly force. While some types of force used by law enforcement may be violent by their very nature, they may be considered "reasonable," based upon the circumstances. However, violations of federal law occur where it can be shown that the force used was willfully "unreasonable" or "excessive" against individuals.
Sexual assaults by officials acting under "color of law" could happen in a variety of venues. They could occur in court scenarios, jails, and/or traffic stops to name just a few of the settings where an official might use their position of authority to coerce another individual into sexual compliance. The compliance is generally gained because of a threat of an official action against the other if they do not comply.
The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution guarantees the right against unreasonable searches or seizures. A law enforcement official using his authority provided under the "color of law" is allowed to stop individuals and even if necessary to search them and retain their property under certain circumstances. It is in the abuse of that discretionary power that a violation of a person's civil rights might occur. An unlawful detention or an illegal confiscation of property would be examples of such an abuse of power.
An official would violate the color of law statute by fabricating evidence against or conducting a false arrest of an individual. That person's rights of due process and unreasonable seizure have been violated. In the case of deprivation of property, the official would violate the color of law statute by unlawfully obtaining or maintaining the property of another. In that case, the official has overstepped or misapplied his authority.
The Fourteenth Amendment secures the right to due process and the Eighth Amendment also prohibits the use of cruel and unusual punishment. In an arrest or detention context, these rights would prohibit the use of force amounting to punishment (summary judgment). The idea being that a person accused of a crime is to be allowed the opportunity to have a trial and not be subjected to punishment without having been afforded the opportunity of the legal process.
Post a Comment